The journal operates under a collective editorial decision-making model. Each manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer-review process conducted by at least two independent external reviewers. The final publication decision is made by an independent scholar with relevant expertise, separate from the review process and appointed according to the journal’s editorial policies. This separation of roles prevents any single individual from exerting excessive influence and helps minimize bias. Such a structure ensures fairness, impartiality, and academic integrity.
Kuo-Zheng Feng, PhD Candidate
National Chengchi University, Taiwan
Responsible for journal operations, submission management, and administrative coordination.
Comprising experienced educators and practitioners, the Advisory Board provides guidance on the journal’s scope, relevance, and engagement with educational practice. Members include:
- Professor Emerita Chun-Lin Lo – Providence University, Taiwan
- Assistant Professor Yu-Fen Lee – Tatung University, Taiwan
- Senior Secondary School Teacher Chuan-Rong Feng – Taiwan (30 years teaching experience)
Note: The journal currently does not have a permanent Editorial Board or Editor-in-Chief. Editorial decisions are made on a case-by-case basis using the independent and transparent process described above.
- All manuscripts are reviewed by at least two independent external reviewers.
- Reviewers’ identities remain confidential, ensuring a double-blind process.
- Final publication decisions are made by an independent scholar in the relevant field, separate from the review process and in accordance with the journal’s editorial guidelines.
- This separation of roles safeguards procedural fairness and academic integrity.